Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187649›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

The ethics of euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative content analysis of case summaries (2012-2020).

Antonie Stef Groenewoud, Ellen Leijten, Sterre van den Oever, Julia van Sommeren, Theodoor Adriaan Boer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonie Stef GroenewoudRadboud University Medical Center, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5919-4856
Ellen LeijtenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sterre van den OeverRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Julia van SommerenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Theodoor Adriaan BoerProtestant Theological University, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0026-7974
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLProtestant Theological University · NL

Funding

Paradosis Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practice of euthanasia in dementia has thus far been described both in terms of its empirical patient characteristics and its ethical questions. However, 40 new cases have been published since the last study.

methodsA qualitative content analysis of all 111 Dutch case summaries of euthanasia in dementia patients between 2012 and 2020, selected from the total of 1117 cases published by the Regional Euthanasia Review Committees (RTE). Our initial analytical framework consists of six due care criteria and five ethical principles.

results111 case summaries were analyzed, from which we distilled seven recurring ethical questions: (1) How voluntary is a request? (2) Can an incapacitated patient make well-considered requests? (3) What constitutes "unbearable suffering"? (4) What if the unbearableness of suffering solely consists of "the absence of any prospect of improvement"? (5) What if a euthanasia request is meant to prevent future suffering (now for then)? (6) How (well) can a patient with cognitive limitations be informed? (7) What are "reasonable alternatives" and what if patients decline available alternatives?

conclusionsBeyond these questions, however, we also see some serious challenges for the future: (a) narrowing the gap between perceived and real nursing home quality, since many advance euthanasia directives refer to nursing homes as sources of unbearable suffering; (b) making information to incompetent patients and their relatives about end of life options more tailor made, since it is questionable whether patients with dementia currently understand all of the euthanasia procedure; (c) involving patients' own physician as long as possible in a euthanasia request. Training may help physicians to deal better with euthanasia requests by patients suffering from dementia; (d) longitudinal research is required that encompasses all dementia euthanasia cases, not only those selected by the RTE.

Indexed as

DementiaEuthanasiaPhysiciansSuicide, AssistedAdvance DirectivesDecision MakingEuthanasia, Active, VoluntaryHumansNetherlandsdementiaend of life careethicseuthanasiaquality

Identifiers

PMID35187649
PMCPMC9306787
OpenAlexW4212830991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.