ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2022
Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Commission on Cancer Standards 5.3-5.8.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching to the Standard: The Cancer Surgery Standards Program as a Framework for Surgical Oncology Training.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Risk factors of postoperative non-compliance behavior in elderly patients with gastrointestinal malignant tumors.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Surgical Trainee Familiarity and Knowledge of the Commission on Cancer Operative Standards: A National Survey Study.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Article
- Progress in cell-based immunotherapies for solid tumors.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Nanotechnological Innovations in Cancer: from Molecular Pathways to Clinical Applications.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Evaluating Variation in Lymph Node Sampling During Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- A standardized surgical approach to multifocal locoregionally recurrent left-sided adrenocortical carcinoma.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2025Observational
- Perspectives on Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 on Lung Cancer: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- Early compliance with lung cancer lymph node standard 5.8: An analysis of 2022 and 2023 Commission on Cancer site reviews.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Defining and Achieving High-Quality Colon Cancer Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Mapping Implementation Strategies to Address Barriers to Commission on Cancer's Accreditation Standards in Breast Surgery.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2025Article
- National Variation in Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Omentum transplantation for malignant tumors: a narrative review of emerging techniques and clinical applications.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Early Compliance with Commission on Cancer Operative Standards for Breast Cancer Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: Surgical Standards Version 1.0.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of engineered microbes in immunotoxin-based cancer therapy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- A bibliometric and visualization analysis of the role of traditional Chinese medicine in cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Operative Standards for Cancer Care: One Step at a Time.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines in oncology have typically focused on workup, disease staging, and medical management. Although recommendations for surgical care have been included in these guidelines, those recommendations have primarily addressed issues such as the role of surgery or the incorporation of surgery into multidisciplinary treatment strategies, not the technical performance of the operative procedures themselves. Therefore, the quality of surgery, the only component of multidisciplinary cancer care proven to be potentially curative, has been poorly controlled. During the past decade, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) cancer programs have attempted to fill this gap by developing "operative standards" for cancer surgery. This report discusses the history of the operative standards, highlights evidence to demonstrate their efficacy, and describes the activities of the ACS Commission on Cancer and Cancer Surgery Standards Program toward disseminating and implementing them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35187620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.