ArticleProgress in orthodontics2022
New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties.
Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Microhardness and Chemical Composition of Different Ceramic Self-Ligating Brackets: AnDentistry journal · 2025Article
- A 3D-Printed Crown Integrated with 3D-Printed Orthodontic Brackets: A Novel One-Unit Printing Technique.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- The Mechanical and Clinical Properties of Customized Orthodontic Bracket Systems-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Precision of slot widths and torque transmission of in-office 3D printed brackets : An in vitro study.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024Article
- From biomimetics to smart materials and 3D technology: Applications in orthodontic bonding, debonding, and appliance design or fabrication.The Japanese dental science review · 2023Review
- In-office Customized Brackets: Aligning with the Future.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- Clinically Relevant Properties of 3D Printable Materials for Intraoral Use in Orthodontics: A Critical Review of the Literature.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- New aesthetic in-house 3D-printed brackets: proof of concept and fundamental mechanical properties.Progress in orthodontics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThree-dimensional (3D) printing technology is an emerging manufacturing process for many orthodontic appliances, and the aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of resin-based materials as alternatives for the in-house preparation of orthodontic brackets. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwo types of 3D printed resins used for temporary (T) and permanent (P) crown fabrication were included in this study. Ten blocks from each resin were manufactured by a 3D printer and, after embedding them in acrylic resin, the samples were subjected to metallographic grinding and polishing, followed by instrumented indentation testing (IIT). Martens hardness (HM), indentation modulus (E
resultsNo statistically significant differences in the mechanical properties of the two tested materials were seen: HM: median 279 N/mm
conclusionsUnder the limitations of this study, it may be concluded that the mechanical properties of the two 3D printed resins tested are equal, and thus, no differences in their clinical performance are expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.