Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2021

Developing and Evaluating a University Recommender System.

Mehdi Elahi, Alain Starke, Nabil El Ioini, Anna Alexander Lambrix, Christoph Trattner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehdi ElahiBehavioral Data Analytics & Recommender Systems Research Group (DARS), Department of Information Science & Media Studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Alain StarkeBehavioral Data Analytics & Recommender Systems Research Group (DARS), Department of Information Science & Media Studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nabil El IoiniSoftware and Systems Engineering Research Group, Free University of Bolzano & Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Anna Alexander LambrixSoftware and Systems Engineering Research Group, Free University of Bolzano & Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Christoph TrattnerBehavioral Data Analytics & Recommender Systems Research Group (DARS), Department of Information Science & Media Studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenge for many young adults is to find the right institution to follow higher education. Global university rankings are a commonly used, but inefficient tool, for they do not consider a person's preferences and needs. For example, some persons pursue prestige in their higher education, while others prefer proximity. This paper develops and evaluates a university recommender system, eliciting user preferences as ratings to build predictive models and to generate personalized university ranking lists. In Study 1, we performed offline evaluation on a rating dataset to determine which recommender approaches had the highest predictive value. In Study 2, we selected three algorithms to produce different university recommendation lists in our online tool, asking our users to compare and evaluate them in terms of different metrics (Accuracy, Diversity, Perceived Personalization, Satisfaction, and Novelty). We show that a SVD algorithm scores high on accuracy and perceived personalization, while a KNN algorithm scores better on novelty. We also report findings on preferred university features.

Indexed as

educationoffline evaluationrecommender systemsuniversityusabilityuser study

Identifiers

PMID35187474
PMCPMC8848746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.