ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2019
Macular Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Ocular Hypertension as Assessed Using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the macular choroidal thickness (CT) in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and compare the results with healthy individuals.
methodsThirty eyes of 30 patients newly diagnosed with OHT and 24 eyes of 24 healthy controls were included in this cross-sectional study. After a detailed ophthalmological examination, macular CT was measured with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at the fovea and at positions 500 μ, 1000 μ, 1500 μ nasal and temporal to the fovea. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the CT measurements between groups. The correlation between the mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) and CT was evaluated with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.
resultsThe mean CT in the OHT group was significantly thinner than that of the controls at locations 1000 μ (250.13±69.53μ vs 275.92±47.34μ; p=0.02) and 1500μ (236.03±65.44μ vs 265.46±47.56μ; p=0.009) temporal to the fovea. The CT at the other measurement points was also thinner in eyes with OHT, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance. A moderately negative correlation was detected between the mean deviation and CT at locations 1000μ (r=-0.42; p=0.03) and 1500μ (r=-0.44; p=0.02) temporal to the fovea There was a moderate correlation between the average RNFL thickness and CT at locations 500μ (r=0.44; p=0.03), 1000μ (r=0.42; p=0.04) and 1500μ (r=0.56; p=0.005) temporal to the fovea.
conclusionIn the present study, the macular CT was thinner in patients with OHT and this thinning was statistically significant at the temporal macula. A longitudinal, prospective study involving multiple EDI-OCT measurements is required to further understand the relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.