ArticleACS omega2022
Study on Preparation and Properties of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Composites Filled with Different Carbon Materials.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UPE) has been restricted due to its linear structure and low thermal conductivity. In this paper, graphene oxide (GO) was prepared by the modified Hummers method, and then UPE/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) powder was prepared by reduction with hydrazine hydrate. UPE/natural graphite (NG), UPE/carbon nanofiber (CNF), and UPE/rGO are prepared by hot compression molding. With the increase of thermally conductive fillers, the high density of the composite makes the thermal conductivity of the crystal structure more regular and the thermal conductivity path increases accordingly. Both TGA and SEM confirmed the uniform dispersion of carbon filler in epoxy resin. Among the three composites, UPE/NG has the best thermal conductivity. When the NG filling content is 60 phr, the thermal conductivity of the UPE/NG composite is 3.257 W/(mK), outperforming UPE/CNFs (0.778 W/(mK) and pure UPE (0.496 W/(mK) by 318.64 and 556.65%, respectively. UPE/CNFs have the best dielectric properties. Comparison of various carbon fillers can provide some references for UPE's thermal management applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.