Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187297›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Similarity-Based Virtual Screen Using Enhanced Siamese Deep Learning Methods.

Mohammed Khaldoon Altalib, Naomie Salim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammed Khaldoon AltalibSchool of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-1840
Naomie SalimSchool of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8509-3055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional drug production is a long and complex process that leads to new drug production. The virtual screening technique is a computational method that allows chemical compounds to be screened at an acceptable time and cost. Several databases contain information on various aspects of biologically active substances. Simple statistical tools are difficult to use because of the enormous amount of information and complex data samples of molecules that are structurally heterogeneous recorded in these databases. Many techniques for capturing the biological similarity between a test compound and a known target ligand in LBVS have been established. However, despite the good performances of the above methods compared to their prior, especially when dealing with molecules that have homogeneous active structural elements, they are not satisfied when dealing with molecules that are structurally heterogeneous. Deep learning models have recently achieved considerable success in a variety of disciplines due to their powerful generalization and feature extraction capabilities. Also, the Siamese network has been used in similarity models for more complicated data samples, especially with heterogeneous data samples. The main aim of this study is to enhance the performance of similarity searching, especially with molecules that are structurally heterogeneous. The Siamese architecture will be enhanced using two similarity distance layers with one fusion layer to further improve the similarity measurements between molecules and then adding many layers after the fusion layer for some models to improve the retrieval recall. In this architecture, several methods of deep learning have been used, which are long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), convolutional neural network-one dimension (CNN1D), and convolutional neural network-two dimensions (CNN2D). A series of experiments have been carried out on real-world data sets, and the results have shown that the proposed methods outperformed the existing methods.

Identifiers

PMID35187297
PMCPMC8851658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.