Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187246›Full record

ReviewMDM policy & practice

A Review of the Presentation of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids.

Ashley J Housten, Lisa M Lowenstein, Aubri Hoffman, Lianne E Jacobs, Zineb Zirari, Diana S Hoover, Dawn Stacey, Greg Pratt, Therese B Bevers, Robert J Volk

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment; how to deal with too much medicine.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley J HoustenDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-0678
Lisa M LowensteinDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Aubri HoffmanDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4803-8668
Lianne E JacobsDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Zineb ZirariDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Diana S HooverDepartment of Health Disparities Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Dawn StaceyOttawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-741X
Greg PrattThe University of Texas MD Anderson Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Therese B BeversDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Robert J VolkDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-5854
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Breast Cancer Screening: Priorities and Attitudes of Diverse Women Under 50R00MD011485 · NIMHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOUSTEN, ASHLEY · 2019 to 2021
$712k
Breast Cancer Screening: Priorities and Attitudes of Diverse Women Under 50K99MD011485 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HOUSTEN, ASHLEY · 2017 to 2018
$177k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIMHD NIH HHS K99 MD011485NIMHD NIH HHS R00 MD011485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cancerdecision aidshealth communicationscreeningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35187246
PMCPMC8855414
OpenAlexW2988726974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.