Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187192›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Perceptions of Telemedicine and Costs Incurred by a Visit to a General Infectious Diseases Clinic: A Survey.

Emily C Evers, Stephanie A Fritz, Graham A Colditz, Jason P Burnham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Open forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Teledentistry Acceptability Among Latina/o/x Adults in Rural Southwest Virginia.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily C EversBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Stephanie A FritzDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jason P BurnhamDivision of Infectious Diseases Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-3006
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024269NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe costs of attending in-person general infectious diseases clinics and preferences for visit type (telemedicine vs in-person) are not well known. We aimed to measure the time-related, monetary, social, and societal costs associated with travel to an in-person clinic visit and to assess patients' preferences, questions, and concerns regarding telemedicine.

methodsPatients (≥18 years, living ≥25 miles from clinic at time of clinic visit) were recruited for this survey study from the general infectious diseases (ID) clinic at Washington University from June 2019 to February 2020. We calculated time and money potentially saved by telemedicine, as well as carbon dioxide emissions, with the assistance of Google Maps (low/high estimates). We also determined patient preferences regarding telemedicine for ID care.

resultsSeventy-five patients completed the study. The round-trip mean travel distance was 227.2 ± 142.6 miles, mean travel time was 3.6 ± 2.0 hours to 4.5 ± 2.3 hours (low and high estimates from Google Maps), travel costs were $131.34 ± $82.27, and mean carbon dioxide emissions were 91.79 ± 57.60 kg. Fifty-eight patients (77.3%) said they would be willing to have a telemedicine visit in the future, and 30 (40.5%) said they would rather have had their visit the day the survey was completed as a telemedicine visit.

conclusionsTelemedicine has the potential to significantly reduce patient costs, both monetary and time-related, and offers substantial environmental benefits, while being an acceptable method of care delivery to most patients at a general ID clinic.

Indexed as

infectious diseases consultationsocial capital expendituretelemedicinetelemedicine costtelemedicine environmental impact

Identifiers

PMID35187192
PMCPMC8852313
OpenAlexW4206971231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.