ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2021
A Statistical Model to Determine Biomechanical Limits for Physically Safe Interactions With Collaborative Robots.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design, Validation, and Metrological Limits of Biofidelic Instrumentation in PFL Collaborative Robotics: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Trends and Future Paradigms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis on collaborative robotics for industry: safety emerging as a core focus.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- The influence of contact body size on superficial and deep tissue pain perception for development of a collision dummy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards velocity-dependent nonlinear elasticity of human forefinger soft tissue for specification construction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of force pain thresholds to ensure collision safety in worker-robot collaborative operations.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- On the feasibility of a robotic probe manipulator for echocardiography in the prone position.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- Human Factors Considerations for Quantifiable Human States in Physical Human-Robot Interaction: A Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Experimental Comparison of Biofidel Measuring Devices Used for the Validation of Collaborative Robotics Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaborative robots (cobots) provide a wide range of opportunities to improve the ergonomics and efficiency of manual work stations. ISO/TS 15066 defines power and force limiting (PFL) as one of four safeguarding modes for these robots. PFL specifies biomechanical limits for hazardous impacts and pinching contacts that a cobot must not exceed to protect humans from serious injuries. Most of the limits in ISO/TS 15066 are preliminary, since they are based on unverified data from a literature survey. This article presents a human-subject study that provides new and experimentally verified limits for biomechanically safe interactions between humans and cobots. The new limits are specifically tailored to impact and pinching transferred through blunt and semi-sharp surfaces as they can occur in the event of human error or technical failures. Altogether 112 subjects participated in the study and were subjected to tests with emulated impact and pinching loads at 28 different body locations. During the experiments, the contact force was gradually increased until the load evoked a slightly painful feeling on the subject's body location under test. The results confirm that the pain thresholds of males and females are different in specific body regions. Therefore, when defining biomechanical limits, the gender difference must be taken into account. A regression model was utilized to incorporate the gender effect as a covariate into a conventional statistical distribution model that can be used to calculate individual limits, precisely fitted to a specific percentile of a mixed group of male and female workers which interacting with cobots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.