Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187088›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Sampling of Protein Conformational Space Using Hybrid Simulations: A Critical Assessment of Recent Methods.

Burak T Kaynak, James M Krieger, Balint Dudas, Zakaria L Dahmani, Mauricio G S Costa, Erika Balog, Ana Ligia Scott, Pemra Doruker, David Perahia, Ivet Bahar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Burak T KaynakDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
James M KriegerDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Balint DudasDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Zakaria L DahmaniDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Mauricio G S CostaPrograma de Computação Científica, Vice-Presiden̂cia de Educação, Informação e Comunicação, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Erika BalogDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ana Ligia ScottLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Center of Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC-UFABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Pemra DorukerDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
David PerahiaLaboratoire de Biologie et Pharmacologie Appliquée, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ivet BaharDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Toward a Deeper Understanding of Allostery and Allotargeting by Computational ApproachesR01GM139297 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ivet Bahar · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen several hybrid simulation methods for exploring the conformational space of proteins and their complexes or assemblies. These methods often combine fast analytical approaches with computationally expensive full atomic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the goal of rapidly sampling large and cooperative conformational changes at full atomic resolution. We present here a systematic comparison of the utility and limits of four such hybrid methods that have been introduced in recent years: MD with excited normal modes (MDeNM), collective modes-driven MD (CoMD), and elastic network model (ENM)-based generation, clustering, and relaxation of conformations (ClustENM) as well as its updated version integrated with MD simulations (ClustENMD). We analyzed the predicted conformational spaces using each of these four hybrid methods, applied to four well-studied proteins, triosephosphate isomerase (TIM), 3-phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), HIV-1 protease (PR) and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), which provide extensive ensembles of experimental structures for benchmarking and comparing the methods. We show that a rigorous multi-faceted comparison and multiple metrics are necessary to properly assess the differences between conformational ensembles and provide an optimal protocol for achieving good agreement with experimental data. While all four hybrid methods perform well in general, being especially useful as computationally efficient methods that retain atomic resolution, the systematic analysis of the same systems by these four hybrid methods highlights the strengths and limitations of the methods and provides guidance for parameters and protocols to be adopted in future studies.

Indexed as

3-phosphoglycerate kinaseconformational landscape/spaceelastic network modelsHIV-1 proteaseHIV-1 reverse transcriptasemolecular simulationsnormal mode analysistriosephosphate isomerase

Identifiers

PMID35187088
PMCPMC8855042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.