ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blended Learning Compared With Face-to-Face Learning Among Family Medicine Residents: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of blended learning to improve medical students' communication skills: a randomized, controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Evaluating the efficacy of sequential cross-sectional scanning and combined teaching methods for prenatal screening of fetal conotruncal anomalies.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness of a blended learning intervention in cardiac physiotherapy. A randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2023Trial
- Impact of Non-Face-to-Face Teaching with Passive Training on Personal Protective Equipment Use in Health Science Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Quick response-code linked video-based objective structured practical examination: Bridging gaps in pharmacology education.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Medical students' perceptions of learning modalities: development and psychometric validation of the e-learning and face-to-face learning experience questionnaire.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Building Health Equity Research Capacity in Myanmar Through a Virtual, Mentor-Based Training Program.Annals of global health · 2026Article
- Exploring faculty and student perceptions of online surgical teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
- Perceptions from a Single Virtual Near-Peer Mock SBA Examination: A Retrospective Pre-Post Study Among Undergraduate Medical Students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- A Multidisciplinary ICU Clerkship Curriculum Incorporating Simulation and Competency-Based Education: Design, Implementation, and Early Outcomes.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on anatomy education: a student-based survey and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility study of a home-based sensory training system (STS) device for type 1 complex regional pain syndrome in England: Lessons learnt.British journal of pain · 2025Article
- Qualitative investigation of academic routines and mental health among medical students following coronavirus vaccination.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- The impact of online teaching curricula on undergraduate basic surgical skills acquisition.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Training at the Greek National Health Service: A Cross-Sectional Study.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Remote online learning reimagined: perceptions and experiences of medical students in a post-pandemic world.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Microscopy without a microscope? Opportunities and limitations of dental studies in anatomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2025Article
- Data-driven natural computational psychophysiology in class.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- The design, implementation, and evaluation of a blended (in-person and virtual) Clinical Competency Examination for final-year nursing students.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic forced educational institutions to adopt online methods which were inevitable to keep continuity of education across all academia after suspension of traditional educational systems. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of faculty and students of online and face-to-face learning, and their preference of the mode of learning after the pandemic.
methodsThis is a mixed-method study. Quantitative data was collected through a survey from 194 medical students and 33 faculty members, while qualitative data was collected through two focus group discussions with 9 students and another two with 13 faculty members. Quantitative variables were presented as means and standard deviations. Paired samples
resultsMean scores of responses of faculty members and students were higher for face-to-face and blended learning compared to online learning in all survey statements with statistically significant differences. More than half of the students (53.1%) preferred the face-to-face mode of learning, while most of the faculty members (60.6%) preferred the blended mode of learning. Qualitative analysis identified five themes, namely: "Transforming the way theoretical teaching sessions are given," "Face-to-face teaching at campus cannot be replaced for some types of education," "Interaction in online sessions is limited," "Problems and challenges of online examinations," and "Technical issues and challenges of online education." It revealed suggestions that at least 30% of the curriculum could be taught online post-COVID-19. Some aspects of clinically oriented teaching including history taking and case discussions can also be delivered online in the future. Faculty members and students reported that dealing with online education was not difficult, although the transition was not smooth.
conclusionMedical students and faculty members were in favor of face-to-face and blended modes of learning. However, they perceived online mode of learning as an acceptable adaptation in theoretical teaching and in some clinically oriented teaching including history taking and clinical case discussions. Although face-to-face education in medicine is irreplaceable, the blended mode of learning remains an acceptable and practical solution for the post-COVID era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.