Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186907›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Microbial Biocontainment Systems for Clinical, Agricultural, and Industrial Applications.

Aaron Pantoja Angles, Alexander U Valle-Pérez, Charlotte Hauser, Magdy M Mahfouz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Microbial Biotechnology in Medicine.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Secure biosystems design inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Synthetic Biology-Driven Microbial Therapeutics for Disease Treatment.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron Pantoja AnglesLaboratory for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Alexander U Valle-PérezLaboratory for Nanomedicine, Division of Biological Sciences, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Charlotte HauserLaboratory for Nanomedicine, Division of Biological Sciences, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Magdy M MahfouzLaboratory for Genome Engineering and Synthetic Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many applications of synthetic biology require biological systems in engineered microbes to be delivered into diverse environments, such as for

Indexed as

bacterial releasebiocontainment systemsbioproductiondrug deliverymicrobial engineeringsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID35186907
PMCPMC8847691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.