Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Construction and Validation of a Prognostic Risk Model for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on Autophagy-Related Genes.

Cheng Yan, Qingling Liu, Ruoling Jia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. miR-124 and VAMP3 Act Antagonistically in Human Neuroblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. High expression of autophagy-related geneWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheng YanSchool of Pharmacy, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang, China.
Qingling LiuSchool of Pharmacy, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang, China.
Ruoling JiaSchool of Pharmacy, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang, China.
Xinxiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutophagy plays an important role in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the prognostic value of autophagy-related genes (ARGs) in TNBC remains unknown. In this study, we established a survival model to evaluate the prognosis of TNBC patients using ARGs signature.

methodsA total of 222 autophagy-related genes were downloaded from The Human Autophagy Database. The RNA-sequencing data and corresponding clinical data of TNBC were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed autophagy-related genes (DE-ARGs) between normal samples and TNBC samples were determined by the DESeq2 package. Then, univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. According to the LASSO regression results based on univariate Cox, we identified a prognostic signature for overall survival (OS), which was further validated by using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohort. We also found an independent prognostic marker that can predict the clinicopathological features of TNBC. Furthermore, a nomogram was drawn to predict the survival probability of TNBC patients, which could help in clinical decision for TNBC treatment. Finally, we validated the requirement of an ARG in our model for TNBC cell survival and metastasis.

resultsThere are 43 DE-ARGs identified between normal and tumor samples. A risk model for OS using CDKN1A, CTSD, CTSL, EIF4EBP1, TMEM74, and VAMP3 was established based on univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression analysis. Overall survival of TNBC patients was significantly shorter in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group for both the training and validation cohorts. Using the Kaplan-Meier curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we demonstrated the accuracy of the prognostic model. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to verify risk score as an independent predictor. Subsequently, a nomogram was proposed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival for TNBC patients. The calibration curves showed great accuracy of the model for survival prediction. Finally, we found that depletion of EIF4EBP1, one of the ARGs in our model, significantly reduced cell proliferation and metastasis of TNBC cells.

conclusionBased on six ARGs (CDKN1A, CTSD, CTSL, EIF4EBP1, TMEM74, and VAMP3), we developed a risk prediction model that can help clinical doctors effectively predict the survival status of TNBC patients. Our data suggested that EIF4EBP1 might promote the proliferation and migration in TNBC cell lines. These findings provided a novel insight into the vital role of the autophagy-related genes in TNBC and may provide new therapeutic targets for TNBC.

Indexed as

AutophagyEIF4EBP1prognosisrisk modelTNBC (triple-negative breast cancer)

Identifiers

PMID35186763
PMCPMC8854264
OpenAlexW4225982962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.