Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Assessment of Molecular Residual Disease Using Circulating Tumor DNA to Identify Multiple Myeloma Patients at High Risk of Relapse.

Binod Dhakal, Shruti Sharma, Mustafa Balcioglu, Svetlana Shchegrova, Meenakshi Malhotra, Bernhard Zimmermann, Paul R Billings, Alexandra Harrington, Himanshu Sethi, Alexey Aleshin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. [Research progress on circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for minimal residual disease in solid tumors].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Binod DhakalDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) & Cellular Therapy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Shruti SharmaOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Mustafa BalciogluOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Svetlana ShchegrovaOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Meenakshi MalhotraOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Bernhard ZimmermannOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Paul R BillingsOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Alexandra HarringtonDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Himanshu SethiOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Alexey AleshinOncology, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Parameswaran N HariDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) & Cellular Therapy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Natera (United States) · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (AHCT), patients with multiple myeloma (MM) invariably relapse. Molecular residual disease (MRD)-negativity post-AHCT has emerged as an important prognostic marker predicting the duration of remission. Current techniques for MRD assessment involve bone marrow (BM) aspirate sampling, which is invasive, subject to sample variability and is limited by spatial heterogeneity. We compared the performance of a non-invasive, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based MRD assay with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) of marrow aspirate to predict relapse in AHCT recipients with MM.

methodsMRD assessment using ctDNA was retrospectively analyzed on 80 plasma samples collected at different time points from 28 patients, post-AHCT. MFC was used to assess MRD from BM biopsy. Individual archived BM aspirate slides or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides from the time of MM diagnosis and matched blood were used to assess MRD at 3 months, post-AHCT, using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay.

resultsctDNA was detectable in 70.8% (17/24) of pre-AHCT patients and 53.6% (15/28) of post-AHCT patients (3-month time point). Of the 15 post-AHCT ctDNA-positive patients, 14 relapsed on follow-up. The median PFS for ctDNA-positive patients was 31 months, and that for ctDNA-negative patients was 84 months (HR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.8-17;p=0.0003). No significant difference in PFS was observed in patients stratified by MFC-based MRD status (HR 1.2; 95%CI: 0.3-3.4;p=0.73). The positive predictive value for ctDNA was also significantly higher than MFC (93.3% vs. 68.4%).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates tumor-informed ctDNA analysis is strongly predictive of MM relapse.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)minimal/molecular residual diseasemultiparameter flow cytometry (MFC)multiple myeloma (MM)tumor-informed

Identifiers

PMID35186734
PMCPMC8848740
OpenAlexW4210799960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.