ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Assessment of Molecular Residual Disease Using Circulating Tumor DNA to Identify Multiple Myeloma Patients at High Risk of Relapse.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the Prognostic Power of Circulating Tumor DNA in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA for Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Review
- Whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA for assessment of minimal residual disease in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine-Empowered CAR-T Therapy for Multiple Myeloma: Toward Programmable, Durable, and Precision Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of mass spectrometry in multiple myeloma.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Characterizing circulating rare cells in peripheral blood for detecting and monitoring multiple myeloma and precursor states.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Single-Tube, Switched Temperature Amplicon Barcoding for Multiplex Detection of Rare Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2025Article
- ctDNA as an Objective Marker for Postoperative Residual Disease in Primary Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Deciphering response dynamics and treatment resistance from circulating tumor DNA after CAR T-cells in multiple myeloma.Nature communications · 2025Article
- CAR T-cell therapy to treat multiple myeloma: current state and future directions.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
- Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma Following T-Cell Redirecting Therapies.Cancers · 2024Review
- [Research progress on circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for minimal residual disease in solid tumors].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023Review
- Article
- Clinical significance and biology of circulating tumor DNA in high-risk early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Cancer cell · 2023Article
- Loss of Heterozygosity in the Circulating Tumor DNA and CD138+ Bone Marrow Cells in Multiple Myeloma.Genes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite treatment with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (AHCT), patients with multiple myeloma (MM) invariably relapse. Molecular residual disease (MRD)-negativity post-AHCT has emerged as an important prognostic marker predicting the duration of remission. Current techniques for MRD assessment involve bone marrow (BM) aspirate sampling, which is invasive, subject to sample variability and is limited by spatial heterogeneity. We compared the performance of a non-invasive, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based MRD assay with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) of marrow aspirate to predict relapse in AHCT recipients with MM.
methodsMRD assessment using ctDNA was retrospectively analyzed on 80 plasma samples collected at different time points from 28 patients, post-AHCT. MFC was used to assess MRD from BM biopsy. Individual archived BM aspirate slides or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides from the time of MM diagnosis and matched blood were used to assess MRD at 3 months, post-AHCT, using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay.
resultsctDNA was detectable in 70.8% (17/24) of pre-AHCT patients and 53.6% (15/28) of post-AHCT patients (3-month time point). Of the 15 post-AHCT ctDNA-positive patients, 14 relapsed on follow-up. The median PFS for ctDNA-positive patients was 31 months, and that for ctDNA-negative patients was 84 months (HR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.8-17;p=0.0003). No significant difference in PFS was observed in patients stratified by MFC-based MRD status (HR 1.2; 95%CI: 0.3-3.4;p=0.73). The positive predictive value for ctDNA was also significantly higher than MFC (93.3% vs. 68.4%).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates tumor-informed ctDNA analysis is strongly predictive of MM relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.