Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186729›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Biomarker Landscape in Neuroendocrine Tumors With High-Grade Features: Current Knowledge and Future Perspective.

Michele Prisciandaro, Maria Antista, Alessandra Raimondi, Francesca Corti, Federica Morano, Giovanni Centonze, Giovanna Sabella, Alessandro Mangogna, Giovanni Randon, Filippo Pagani and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michele PrisciandaroMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Maria AntistaMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra RaimondiMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Francesca CortiMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Federica MoranoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni CentonzeFirst Pathology Division, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna SabellaFirst Pathology Division, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro MangognaInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofalo, Trieste, Italy.
Giovanni RandonMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Filippo PaganiMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Natalie PrinziMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Monica NigerMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore CoralloMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Erica Castiglioni di CaronnoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marco MassafraMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Maria Di BartolomeoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Filippo de BraudMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Massimo MilioneFirst Pathology Division, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Sara PuscedduMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are classified based on morphology and are graded based on their proliferation rate as either well-differentiated low-grade (G1) to intermediate (G2-G3) or poorly differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC G3). Recently, in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, a new subgroup of well-differentiated high-grade tumors (NET G3) has been divided from NEC by WHO due to its different clinical-pathologic features. Although several mutational analyses have been performed, a molecular classification of NET is an unmet need in particular for G3, which tends to be more aggressive and have less benefit to the available therapies. Specifically, new possible prognostic and, above all, predictive factors are highly awaited, giving the basis for new treatments. Alteration of

Indexed as

high microsatellite instability (MSI-H)neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)neuroendocrine tumorsnext-generation sequencing (NGS)PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID35186729
PMCPMC8856722
OpenAlexW4210670027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.