ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Early Clinical Outcomes of Polydioxanone Mesh for Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Absorbable Synthetic Meshes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Subcutaneous Mastectomy: A Systematic Review with Clinical and Economic Considerations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Short-term Outcomes of Polydioxanone Synthetic Mesh in 2-stage Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Comparative Study.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Article
- Early Experience with Synthetic Monofilament Polydioxanone Mesh in Primary Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Matched Analysis.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Early Use and Outcomes of Polydioxanone Mesh in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Mesh Use in Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Complications and Aesthetic Outcomes.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many biologic matrices and synthetic meshes are available as adjuncts for prosthetic and autologous breast reconstructions to help control implant position and to reinforce abdominal flap donor sites. Absorbable synthetic meshes may have advantages over biologic matrices and permanent meshes, such as lower cost and better long-term biocompatibility. We present a prospective case series of patients undergoing two-stage, prepectoral breast reconstruction with polydioxanone (PDO) mesh.
methodsThis prospective, consecutive single-surgeon series of patients who received PDO mesh during two-stage, prepectoral breast reconstruction involved incorporation of the PDO mesh at stage 1 as an anterior tarp over the tissue expander. A detailed description of surgical technique is provided herein. Surgical complications monitored included surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, hematoma or seroma requiring operative intervention, and reconstructive failure.
resultsSeven patients with fourteen breast reconstructions were included in the study. All patients had unilateral cancer and underwent bilateral mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. The average age of patient was 50.0 (SD 7.4) and BMI was 29.3 (SD 2.7). Patients were followed for a median of 274 days, during which only one late infection (7.1%) occurred requiring expander removal.
conclusionsPDO mesh has an acceptable short-term complication rate in two-stage prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction. Future investigations should elucidate its comparative efficacy and safety against alternative products with respect to long-term outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.