ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Treatment of Keloids: A Meta-analysis of Intralesional Triamcinolone, Verapamil, and Their Combination.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing intralesional triamcinolone and verapamil-triamcinolone injections in keloids: A single-blinded randomised clinical trial.International wound journal · 2023Trial
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Intralesional triamcinolone versus 5-fluorouracil for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A randomized comparative clinical study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Prophylactic adjuvant therapy for postoperative recurrence of urethral stricture: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Paper battery powered iontophoresis microneedles patch for hypertrophic scar treatment.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Compression Therapy for Keloid Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Development and validation of novel keloid-derived immortalized fibroblast cell lines.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keloids are skin lesions of abnormal and excessive scar proliferation that have no agreed upon gold standard of therapy. Extensive research in this area has shown that both intralesional triamcinolone and verapamil are effective in their treatment.
methodsA review of these two treatment modalities was conducted via an extensive search of existing literature published in PubMed, Scopus Libraries, and Science Direct databases using keywords "keloid," "verapamil," "triamcinolone," "intralesional," "treatment," and "corticosteroid" published between 1996 and 2021. From these included studies, clinical trials that directly compared the effects of intralesional triamcinolone and verapamil from 2008 to 2021 were included in a meta-analysis. Lastly, the minimal current research pertaining to a potential future direction of their combination was described.
resultsOver 30 publications were included in this literature review to describe the current state of keloid treatment and outline the advantages and disadvantages of intralesional triamcinolone and verapamil. Eight of these studies were included in the meta-analysis which had varying results. In all studies, greater improvement was seen in the triamcinolone acetonide group compared with the verapamil group. However, these improved results were associated with a higher rate of adverse effects.
conclusionsWhen comparing the modalities of triamcinolone acetonide and verapamil for keloid treatment, triamcinolone acetonide shows more significant and rapid improvement compared with verapamil; however, there are also increased adverse effects. Minimal combination studies of these treatments have shown that perhaps using them together can augment their mechanisms without the unwanted side effects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.