ArticleCureus2022
The Impact of an Intensivist-Led Critical Care Transition Program.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-pharmacological post-intensive care interventions to improve patient outcome following critical illness: a scoping review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Transitional Care Programs for Patients with High Nursing Activity Scores Reduce Unplanned Readmissions to Intensive Care Units.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEvaluate the impact of a post-discharge critical care transition program (CTP) on intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, in-hospital mortality, and six-month survival.
methodsThis was a prospective observational, single-center study, with a before-after design, in a critical care department in a tertiary hospital in Northern Portugal. Critically ill patients with ICU stay > 48 h or intermediate care stay >72 h or tracheostomized patients were included in the program. Historic controls included critically ill patients admitted in the six months prior to program implementation. The follow-up visit included a medical evaluation by an intensivist and a meeting with the attending physician. The primary outcome was critical care department readmission. Secondary outcomes were mortality at hospital discharge, 28-day, and six-month mortality. The readmission rate was compared between groups. Multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis were used to evaluate survival benefits.
resultsBetween September 2020 and March 2021, 132 patients were included in the CTP. The Control group included 196 patients. The intensivist's assessment led to management change in 15.1% of patients. The CTP group had a non-significant lower readmission rate (0.8% vs. 4.1%; p=0.09). Multivariate analysis showed a benefit for the CTP regarding in-hospital, 28-day, and six-month mortality. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis showed improved survival in the CTP group.
conclusionsThe CTP reduced, non-significantly, the readmission rate, and significantly improved in-hospital and six-month mortality. Further analyses are needed to improve inclusion criteria and better allocate human resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.