Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186464›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Interpretation of exercise-induced changes in human skeletal muscle mRNA expression depends on the timing of the post-exercise biopsies.

Jujiao Kuang, Cian McGinley, Matthew J-C Lee, Nicholas J Saner, Andrew Garnham, David J Bishop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Muscle Plasticity, Adaptation and Epigenetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jujiao KuangInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cian McGinleySportscotland Institute of Sport, Stirling, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5575-4262
Matthew J-C LeeInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-3445
Nicholas J SanerInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew GarnhamInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David J BishopInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6956-9188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise elicits a range of adaptive responses in skeletal muscle, which include changes in mRNA expression. To better understand the health benefits of exercise training, it is important to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms of skeletal muscle adaptation to exercise. However, most studies have assessed the molecular events at only a few time-points within a short time frame post-exercise, and the variations of gene expression kinetics have not been addressed systematically.

methodsWe assessed the mRNA expression of 23 gene isoforms implicated in the adaptive response to exercise at six time-points (0, 3, 9, 24, 48, and 72 h post exercise) over a 3-day period following a single session of high-intensity interval exercise.

resultsThe temporal patterns of target gene expression were highly variable and the expression of mRNA transcripts detected was largely dependent on the timing of muscle sampling. The largest fold change in mRNA expression of each tested target gene was observed between 3 and 72 h post-exercise. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsOur findings highlight an important gap in knowledge regarding the molecular response to exercise, where the use of limited time-points within a short period post-exercise has led to an incomplete understanding of the molecular response to exercise. Muscle sampling timing for individual studies needs to be carefully chosen based on existing literature and preliminary analysis of the molecular targets of interest. We propose that a comprehensive time-course analysis on the exercise-induced transcriptional response in humans will significantly benefit the field of exercise molecular biology.

Indexed as

ExerciseMuscle, SkeletalBiopsyHumansKineticsRNA, MessengerRNA, MessengerExerciseExercise-induced adaptationGene expressionSkeletal muscleTime-course

Identifiers

PMID35186464
PMCPMC8820226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.