Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186457›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

A comparative study of bacterial diversity based on effects of three different shade shed types in the rhizosphere of

Xianchang Wang, Xu Guo, Lijuan Hou, Jiaohong Zhang, Jing Hu, Feng Zhang, Jilei Mao, Zhifen Wang, Congjing Zhang, Jinlong Han and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xianchang Wang *Key Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Xu Guo *Key Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Lijuan HouWeihai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Weihai, China.
Jiaohong ZhangKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jing HuWeihai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Weihai, China.
Feng ZhangKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jilei MaoWeihai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Weihai, China.
Zhifen WangKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Congjing ZhangKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jinlong HanKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Yanwei ZhuKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Chao LiuKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jinyue SunKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.
Chenggang ShanKey Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Research Center of Medicinal Plant, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShading is an important factor affecting the cultivation of American ginseng, as it influences crop quality and yield. Rhizosphere microorganisms are also crucial for normal plant growth and development. However, whether different shade types significantly change American ginseng rhizosphere microorganisms is unknown.

methodsThis study evaluated the rhizosphere soils of American ginseng under traditional, high flag and high arch shade sheds. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing determined the change of rhizosphere bacterial communities.

resultsThe microbial diversity in rhizosphere soils of American ginseng significantly changed under different shading conditions. The bacteria diversity was more abundant in the high arch shade than flat and traditional shades. Different bacterial genera, including

Indexed as

PanaxBacteriaPlant RootsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil16s rRNAAmerican ginsengBacteriaRhizosphereShade shedSoil

Identifiers

PMID35186457
PMCPMC8840058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.