Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186317›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering

Garments for functional electrical stimulation: Design and proofs of concept.

Bastien Moineau, Cesar Marquez-Chin, Milad Alizadeh-Meghrazi, Milos R Popovic

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advance in pediatric spinal cord injury.Pediatric discovery · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bastien MoineauRehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Lyndhurst Centre, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8244-577X
Cesar Marquez-ChinRehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Lyndhurst Centre, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-4122
Milad Alizadeh-MeghraziRehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Lyndhurst Centre, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Milos R PopovicRehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Lyndhurst Centre, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRepeated use of functional electrical stimulation can promote functional recovery in individuals with neurological paralysis. We designed garments able to deliver functional electrical stimulation.

methodsShirts and pants containing electrodes knitted with a conductive yarn were produced. Electrodes were moistened with water before use. Stimulation intensity at four thresholds levels (sensory, movement, full range of motion, and maximal), stimulation comfort, and electrical properties of the interface were tested in one able-bodied subject with garment electrodes and size-matched conventional gel electrodes. The pants and shirt were then used to explore usability and design limitations.

resultsCompared to gel electrodes, fabric electrodes had a lower sensory threshold (on forearm muscles) but they had a higher maximal stimulation threshold (for all tested muscles). The stimulation delivery was comfortable when the garment electrodes were recently moistened; however, as the electrodes dried (within 9 to 18 min) stimulation became unpleasant. Inconsistent water content in the fabric electrodes caused inconsistent intensity thresholds and inconsistent voltage necessary to apply a desired stimulation current. Garments' tightness and impracticality of electrode lead necessitate further design improvement.

conclusionsFabric electrodes offer a promising alternative to gel electrodes. Further work involving people with paralysis is required to overcome the identified challenges.

Indexed as

Assistive technologydesign requirementselectrical stimulationfunctional textilespinal cord injury rehabilitationstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35186317
PMCPMC8855467
OpenAlexW2963929239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.