Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186276›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2022

Contaminants in the cow's milk we consume? Pasteurization and other technologies in the elimination of contaminants.

Micaela Belen Calahorrano-Moreno, Jonathan Jerry Ordoñez-Bailon, Ricardo José Baquerizo-Crespo, Alex Alberto Dueñas-Rivadeneira, Maria Conceição B S M Montenegro, Joan Manuel Rodríguez-Díaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Unveiling the persistent threat: recent insights intoJournal of food science and technology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Micaela Belen Calahorrano-Moreno *Departamento de Procesos Químicos, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Físicas y Químicas, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Manabí, 130104, Ecuador.
Jonathan Jerry Ordoñez-Bailon *Departamento de Procesos Químicos, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Físicas y Químicas, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Manabí, 130104, Ecuador.
Ricardo José Baquerizo-CrespoDepartamento de Procesos Químicos, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Físicas y Químicas, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Manabí, 130104, Ecuador.
Alex Alberto Dueñas-RivadeneiraDepartamento de Procesos Agroindustriales, Facultad de Ciencias Zootécnicas, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Manabí, 130104, Ecuador.
Maria Conceição B S M MontenegroREQUIMTE/Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Porto, 4050-313, Portugal.
Joan Manuel Rodríguez-DíazDepartamento de Procesos Químicos, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Físicas y Químicas, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Manabí, 130104, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3791-8849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cow's milk is currently the most consumed product worldwide. However, due to various direct and indirect contamination sources, different chemical and microbiological contaminants have been found in cow's milk. This review details the main contaminants found in cow's milk, referring to the sources of contamination and their impact on human health. A comparative approach highlights the poor efficacy and effects of the pasteurization process with other methods used in the treatment of cow's milk. Despite pasteurization and related techniques being the most widely applied to date, they have not demonstrated efficacy in eliminating contaminants. New technologies have appeared as alternative treatments to pasteurization. However, in addition to causing physicochemical changes in the raw material, their efficacy is not total in eliminating chemical contaminants, suggesting the need for new research to find a solution that contributes to improving food safety.

Indexed as

MilkPasteurizationAllergensAnimalsCattleFemaleAllergenshuman health; chemical contaminant; microbiological contaminant; alternative; technology; food safety

Identifiers

PMID35186276
PMCPMC8822143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.