ArticleF1000Research2021
Flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates from neuroblastoma patients is a highly sensitive technique for quantification of low-level neuroblastoma.
Article in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone marrow evaluation in neuroblastomas: bone marrow aspirates have little additional value over trephine biopsies.BJC reports · 2025Article
- Sensitive detection of minimal residual disease and immunotherapy targets by multi-modal bone marrow analysis in high-risk neuroblastoma - a multi-center study.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Comparison of Bone Marrow Biopsy and Flow Cytometry in Demonstrating Bone Marrow Metastasis of Neuroblastoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Multi-Color Flow Cytometric Assay for Quantifying Dinutuximab Binding to Neuroblastoma Cells in Tumor, Bone Marrow, and Blood.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- BPTF in bone marrow provides a potential progression biomarker regulated by TFAP4 through the PI3K/AKT pathway in neuroblastoma.Biological procedures online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.