ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2022
Durable outcomes of double cord blood transplantation in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: high-risk features for early and long-term mortality.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relapse patterns focusing on central nervous system involvement after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a high-risk feature of central nervous system relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Real-world treatment outcome and toxicity analysis of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: multicenter prospective observational study.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and therapeutic advances in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of gene analysis and targeted immunotherapy.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Haploidentical versus Double-Cord Blood Stem Cells as a Second Transplantation for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCord blood transplantation (CBT) has been reported as an acceptable option with comparable outcomes to conventional donors in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We aimed to analyze the long-term CBT outcomes and risk factors for early and long-term mortalities.
methodsBetween 2006 and 2020, 112 patients (median age: 35 years; 62 Ph-negative ALL and 50 Ph-positive ALL) were treated with double CBT. Conditioning regimen consisted of total body irradiation (12 Gy) plus cytarabine (9.0 g/m
resultsThe median time for neutrophil and platelet recovery was 25 days (range: 5-59 days) and 34 days (range: 7-185 days), respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 1 year was 43.8%, and the incidence of acute GVHD with grades III-IV was 8.9%. The overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 22.0%, and the incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 8.5%. After a median follow-up of 60.1 months (range: 5.7-181.3 months), the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 15.9% and 28.5% (9.7% and 27.2% for CR1), respectively, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 57.9% (66.5% for CR1). In multivariate analysis of 88 patients receiving double CBT in CR1, delayed CR1 was related to high CIR, and age older than 40 years was associated with high NRM and early mortality. Unexpectedly, Ph-positive ALL with MRD had a higher NRM and early mortality than Ph-negative ALL and Ph-positive ALL without MRD subgroups, possibly due to delayed neutrophil and platelet recovery.
conclusionOur data suggest that double CBT for adult ALL in CR1 has a greater benefit in younger patients and in patients with Ph-positive ALL without MRD or Ph-negative ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.