Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186177›Full record

ArticleACM transactions on accessible computing2021

Investigating Best Practices for Remote Summative Usability Testing with People with Mild to Moderate Dementia.

Rachel Wood, Emma Dixon, Salma Elsayed-Ali, Etka Shokeen, Amanda Lazar, Jonathan Lazar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM transactions on accessible computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Introducing and Familiarising Older Adults Living with Dementia and Their Caregivers to Virtual Reality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. The Hong Kong Grocery Shopping Dialog Task (HK-GSDT): A Quick Screening Test for Neurocognitive Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel WoodInformation Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Emma DixonInformation Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Salma Elsayed-AliInformation Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Etka ShokeenInformation Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Amanda LazarInformation Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Jonathan LazarInformation Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with dementia may miss out on the benefits of using technology, because they often find it difficult to use. Usability testing is one method to identify barriers and areas for improvement in technology. Unfortunately, usability testing is often not conducted with people with dementia, independent of their caregivers. Difficulty recruiting local participants with dementia who regularly use technology further compounds the problem. Remote methods have been proposed as one approach to recruiting hard-to-reach populations. Currently, it is unclear how to effectively conduct remote summative usability testing with people with dementia. We recruited 15 participants. Five took part in the pilot study and 10 participated in the main study. We identify best practices and make suggestions for remote summative usability tests with people who have mild to moderate dementia, independent of caregivers. We discuss our findings in three sections: (1) logistics for planning remote summative usability testing, (2) approaches for conducting remote summative usability testing, including modifications of research methods, and (3) considerations when evaluating findings from remote summative usability sessions. We also present modified usability testing methods we developed to meet the unique needs of users with mild to moderate dementia, and summarize lessons learned and new directions for research on this topic.

Indexed as

dementiadisabilityremote methodsremote summativeRemote usabilityUX

Identifiers

PMID35186177
PMCPMC8855365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.