Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186054›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021

Marine Data Prediction: An Evaluation of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Statistical Predictive Models.

Ahmed Ali, Ahmed Fathalla, Ahmad Salah, Mahmoud Bekhit, Esraa Eldesouky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed AliDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-4104
Ahmed FathallaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5432-5407
Ahmad SalahFaculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Sharkeya 44523, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3433-7640
Mahmoud BekhitDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-4233
Esraa EldesoukyDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6519-0963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, ocean observation technology continues to progress, resulting in a huge increase in marine data volume and dimensionality. This volume of data provides a golden opportunity to train predictive models, as the more the data is, the better the predictive model is. Predicting marine data such as sea surface temperature (SST) and Significant Wave Height (SWH) is a vital task in a variety of disciplines, including marine activities, deep-sea, and marine biodiversity monitoring. The literature has efforts to forecast such marine data; these efforts can be classified into three classes: machine learning, deep learning, and statistical predictive models. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no study compared the performance of these three approaches on a real dataset. This paper focuses on the prediction of two critical marine features: the SST and SWH. In this work, we proposed implementing statistical, deep learning, and machine learning models for predicting the SST and SWH on a real dataset obtained from the Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency. Then, we proposed comparing these three predictive approaches on four different evaluation metrics. Experimental results have revealed that the deep learning model slightly outperformed the machine learning models for overall performance, and both of these approaches greatly outperformed the statistical predictive model.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningModels, StatisticalRepublic of Korea

Identifiers

PMID35186054
PMCPMC8849809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.