Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185954›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Genetic Diversity and Genome Size Variability in the Russian Genebank Collection of Tea Plant [

Lidiia S Samarina, Alexandra O Matskiv, Ruset M Shkhalakhova, Natalia G Koninskaya, Magda-Viola Hanke, Henryk Flachowsky, Alexander N Shumeev, Karina A Manakhova, Lyudmila S Malyukova, Shengrui Liu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ddRAD sequencing of 1076Plant diversity · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Population Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Genome Survey and SSR Analysis ofGenetics research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lidiia S SamarinaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Alexandra O MatskivFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Ruset M ShkhalakhovaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Natalia G KoninskayaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Magda-Viola HankeFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Dresden, Germany.
Henryk FlachowskyFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Dresden, Germany.
Alexander N ShumeevCenter of Genetics and Life Science, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia.
Karina A ManakhovaCenter of Genetics and Life Science, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia.
Lyudmila S MalyukovaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Shengrui LiuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Anhui, China.
Juanyan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Anhui, China.
Maya V GvasaliyaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Valentina I MalyarovskayaFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Alexey V RyndinFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Eduard K PchikhachevFederal Research Centre the Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russia.
Stefanie ReimFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Breeding Research on Fruit Crops, Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tea collection of the FRC SSC RAS (Sochi, Maykop in Russia) represents one of the northernmost germplasm comprising a number of locally derived cultivars and ɣ-irradiation mutants. The latter are often characterized by larger genome size, which may lead to better adaptation to biotic and abiotic stress. Such genotypes may be a valuable genetic resource for better adaptability to extreme environmental conditions, which could enable tea cultivation outside global growing regions. Microsatellite markers are often the best choice for genetic diversity analysis in genebank collections. However, their use in polyploid species is questionable because simple sequence repeat (SSR) allele dosage cannot be readily determined. Therefore, the efficiency of SSR and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers was investigated using 43 selected cultivars from the Russian genebank collection derived from mutant breeding and clonal selection. Previously, the increase in genome size was confirmed in 18 mutants within this collection. Despite the presence of polyploid tea genotypes, our study revealed higher efficiency of SSR markers than SCoT markers. Subsequent SSR analysis of the 106 genotypes in the Russian genebank collection revealed three distinct genetic clusters after STRUCTURE analysis. Greater genetic variation was observed within genetic clusters than between clusters, indicating low genetic variation between collections. Nevertheless, the northernmost tea collection exhibited a greater genetic distance from the other two clusters than they did from each other. Close genetic relationships were found between many cultivars with particularly large leaves and mutant forms. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a significant, moderate correlation between genome size and leaf area size. Our study shows that microsatellite fingerprinting is useful to estimate the genetic diversity and genetic background of tea germplasm in Russia despite polyploid tea accessions. Thus, the results of our study contribute to the development of future tea germplasm conservation strategies and modern tea breeding programs.

Indexed as

Camellia sinensiscold toleranceflow cytometrygenetic diversitygermplasm collectionmolecular markersploidy level

Identifiers

PMID35185954
PMCPMC8847156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.