Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185825›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2021

Biological Approaches Integrating Algae and Bacteria for the Degradation of Wastewater Contaminants-A Review.

Merwin Mammen Mathew, Kanchan Khatana, Vaidehi Vats, Raunak Dhanker, Ram Kumar, Hans-Uwe Dahms, Jiang-Shiou Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Merwin Mammen MathewDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences, School of Engineering Sciences, GD Goenka University, Gurugram, India.
Kanchan KhatanaDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences, School of Engineering Sciences, GD Goenka University, Gurugram, India.
Vaidehi VatsDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences, School of Engineering Sciences, GD Goenka University, Gurugram, India.
Raunak DhankerDepartment of Basic and Applied Sciences, School of Engineering Sciences, GD Goenka University, Gurugram, India.
Ram KumarEcosystem Research Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science, School of Earth, Biological and Environmental Sciences, Central University of South Bihar, Fatehpur, India.
Hans-Uwe DahmsDepartment of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jiang-Shiou HwangInstitute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan.
GD Goenka University · INCentral University of South Bihar · INKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Taiwan Ocean University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional approach for biodegradation of organic matter in sewage treatment used a consortium of bacterial spp. that produce untreated or partially treated inorganic contaminants resulting in large amounts of poor-quality sludge. The aeration process of activated sludge treatment requires high energy. So, a sustainable technique for sewage treatment that could produce less amount of sludge and less energy demanding is required for various developed and developing countries. This led to research into using microalgae for wastewater treatment as they reduce concentrations of nutrients like inorganic nitrates and phosphates from the sewage water, hence reducing the associated chemical oxygen demand (COD). The presence of microalgae removes nutrient concentration in water resulting in reduction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and toxic heavy metals like Al, Ni, and Cu. Their growth also offers opportunity to produce biofuels and bioproducts from algal biomass. To optimize use of microalgae, technologies like high-rate algal ponds (HRAPs) have been developed, that typically use 22% of the electricity used in Sequencing Batch Reactors for activated sludge treatment with added economic and environmental benefits like reduced comparative operation cost per cubic meter, mitigate global warming, and eutrophication potentials. The addition of suitable bacterial species may further enhance the treatment potential in the wastewater medium as the inorganic nutrients are assimilated into the algal biomass, while the organic nutrients are utilized by bacteria. Further, the mutual exchange of CO

Indexed as

bacteriaintegrated approachmicroalgaesustainable methodwastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID35185825
PMCPMC8850834
OpenAlexW4210414650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.