Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Preliminary Outcomes of Combined Treadmill and Overground High-Intensity Interval Training in Ambulatory Chronic Stroke.

Pierce Boyne, Sarah Doren, Victoria Scholl, Emily Staggs, Dustyn Whitesel, Daniel Carl, Rhonna Shatz, Russell Sawyer, Oluwole O Awosika, Darcy S Reisman and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06292442 (Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Muscle Strength, Atrophy and Aerobic Capacity in Stroke Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06292442 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Muscle Strength, Atrophy and Aerobic Capacity in Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled34ConditionsStrokeArmstraditional physical therapy, High intensity interval training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pierce BoyneDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Sarah DorenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Victoria SchollDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Emily StaggsDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Dustyn WhiteselDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Daniel CarlDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Rhonna ShatzDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Russell SawyerDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Oluwole O AwosikaDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Darcy S ReismanDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Sandra A BillingerDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Brett KisselaDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Jennifer VannestDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Kari DunningDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
KL2 Training ProgramKL2TR001426 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ZELLER, MARGARET H · 2015 to 2024
$6.8M
High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: HIT-Stroke Trial 2R01HD093694 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Pierce Boyne · 2018 to 2026
$6.1M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17MCPRP33670446NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001426NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093694NINDS NIH HHS L30 NS103347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLocomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a promising intervention for stroke rehabilitation. However, overground translation of treadmill speed gains has been somewhat limited, some important outcomes have not been tested and baseline response predictors are poorly understood. This pilot study aimed to guide future research by assessing preliminary outcomes of combined overground and treadmill HIIT. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen participants >6 months post-stroke were assessed before and after a 4-week no-intervention control phase and a 4-week treatment phase involving 12 sessions of overground and treadmill HIIT.

resultsOverground and treadmill gait function both improved during the treatment phase relative to the control phase, with overground speed changes averaging 61% of treadmill speed changes (95% CI: 33-89%). Moderate or larger effect sizes were observed for measures of gait performance, balance, fitness, cognition, fatigue, perceived change and brain volume. Participants with baseline comfortable gait speed <0.4 m/s had less absolute improvement in walking capacity but similar proportional and perceived changes.

conclusionsThese findings reinforce the potential of locomotor HIIT research for stroke rehabilitation and provide guidance for more definitive studies. Based on the current results, future locomotor HIIT studies should consider including: (1) both overground and treadmill training; (2) measures of cognition, fatigue and brain volume, to complement typical motor and fitness assessment; and (3) baseline gait speed as a covariate.

Indexed as

aerobic exercisebraingaitlocomotionmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35185766
PMCPMC8854218
OpenAlexW4226248892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.