Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185747›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2021

Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment Increases the Cortical Drive to the Lower Limb Muscle in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Muhammad Samran Navid, Imran Khan Niazi, Dina Lelic, Imran Amjad, Nitika Kumari, Muhammad Shafique, Kelly Holt, Usman Rashid, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Heidi Haavik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad Samran NavidMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Dina LelicMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Imran AmjadFaculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nitika KumariCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Muhammad ShafiqueFaculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Kelly HoltCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Usman RashidFaculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Asbjørn Mohr DrewesMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Heidi HaavikCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Auckland University of Technology · NZMech-Sense · DKNew Zealand College of Chiropractic · NZRiphah International University · PKAalborg University · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of a single session of chiropractic spinal adjustment on the cortical drive to the lower limb in chronic stroke patients. In a single-blinded, randomized controlled parallel design study, 29 individuals with chronic stroke and motor weakness in a lower limb were randomly divided to receive either chiropractic spinal adjustment or a passive movement control intervention. Before and immediately after the intervention, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of the lower limb with the greatest degree of motor weakness. Differences in the averaged peak-peak MEP amplitude following interventions were calculated using a linear regression model. Chiropractic spinal adjustment elicited significantly larger MEP amplitude (pre = 0.24 ± 0.17 mV, post = 0.39 ± 0.23 mV, absolute difference = +0.15 mV, relative difference = +92%,

Indexed as

chiropracticmotor evoked potentialspinal adjustmentstroketranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35185747
PMCPMC8854235
OpenAlexW4210621833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.