Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185709›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Understanding East-West Cultural Differences on Perceived Compensation Fairness Among Executives: From a Neuroscience Perspective.

Fan Yu, Ying Zhao, Jianfeng Yao, Massimiliano Farina Briamonte, Sofia Profita, Yuhan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fan YuBusiness School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Ying ZhaoZhonghua Vocational College, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Jianfeng YaoBusiness School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming, China.
Massimiliano Farina BriamonteDepartment of Economics and Business, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Sofia ProfitaFinancial Sponsors Group of Santander Bank, New York, NY, United States.
Yuhan LiuBusiness College, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience research has found that individuals from different cultures have different neural responses and emotional perceptions. Differences in executives' perception of external pay gaps in different cultures can affect their work attitudes and behavior. In this study, we explore the direct relationship between executive compensation fairness and executive innovation motivation. We also investigate the moderating effects of Confucian culture and western culture between executive compensation fairness and executive innovation motivation. Data were collected from the Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2019 and test the relationship using the fixed-effect panel regression models. The results demonstrate that executive compensation fairness positively influences the executive innovation motivation. This effect is more pronounced in Confucian culture regions, while Western culture weakens this effect. The findings of this study confirmed that executive compensation fairness, provide a cross-cultural comparison for compensation research, validate the findings of cultural neuroscience, and provide useful insights into the research of common prosperity. To improve the corporate compensation structure, it is necessary to consider the relative pay equity with firms in the same region and the influence of corporate culture.

Indexed as

cognitive differencescognitive neuroscienceConfucian culturecultural differencesinnovation motivationperceived compensation fairnessWestern culture

Identifiers

PMID35185709
PMCPMC8847769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.