Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Validation of the French Version of the Positivity Scale (P Scale).

Alexis Vancappel, Robert Courtois, Marta Siragusa, Coraline Hingray, Christian Réveillère, Gianvittorio Caprara, Catherine Belzung, Wissam El-Hage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on French Healthcare Workers: An Observational Cohort Study of PTSD, Depression and Burn-Out.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexis VancappelPôle de Psychiatrie-Addictologie, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Robert CourtoisPôle de Psychiatrie-Addictologie, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
Marta SiragusaUMR 1253, iBrain, Inserm, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Coraline HingrayPôle Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie d'Adultes et d'Addictologie du Grand Nancy, Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy (CPN), Laxou, France.
Christian RéveillèreDépartement de Psychologie, EE 1901 Qualipsy, Qualité de vie et Santé Psychologique, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Gianvittorio CapraraDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Catherine BelzungUMR 1253, iBrain, Inserm, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Wissam El-HagePôle de Psychiatrie-Addictologie, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the French version of the Positivity scale (P scale), a self-report measure of positivity, which is the tendency to view and address life and experience with a positive outlook. Positivity is seen as a latent factor underlying multiple cognitive concepts such as self-esteem, life satisfaction, and optimism.

methodsWe recruited 666 volunteers (540 women and 126 men). They completed the P scale online, as well as self-report measures of psychological well-being, self-esteem, satisfaction with life, general health, and personality dimensions. The study sample was randomly split into two sub-groups, one used for exploratory factor analysis and the other for confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsWe found conflictual results related to the uni-dimensionality of the French version of the P scale. We found good internal consistency and high concurrent validity.

conclusionThe French version of the P scale demonstrated good psychometric qualities and is a reliable tool that can now be used by French researchers and clinicians to assess positivity.

Indexed as

cognitivepositivitypsychometricself-esteemwell-being

Identifiers

PMID35185665
PMCPMC8847605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.