Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185619›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Optimizing the Substrate Uptake Rate of Solute Carriers.

Klaus Schicker, Clemens V Farr, Danila Boytsov, Michael Freissmuth, Walter Sandtner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klaus SchickerCenter of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens V FarrCenter of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Danila BoytsovCenter of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael FreissmuthCenter of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter SandtnerCenter of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF DOC 33Austrian Science Fund FWF P 31813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity in solute carriers arose from evolutionary pressure. Here, we surmised that the adaptive search for optimizing the rate of substrate translocation was also shaped by the ambient extracellular and intracellular concentrations of substrate and co-substrate(s). We explored possible solutions by employing kinetic models, which were based on analytical expressions of the substrate uptake rate, that is, as a function of the microscopic rate constants used to parameterize the transport cycle. We obtained the defining terms for five reaction schemes with identical transport stoichiometry (i.e., Na

Indexed as

evolutionkinetic modeloptimizationsecondary active transporterssolute carrierssubstrate uptake

Identifiers

PMID35185619
PMCPMC8850955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.