Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2022

Automated Grooming Detection of Mouse by Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.

Naoaki Sakamoto, Koji Kobayashi, Teruko Yamamoto, Sakura Masuko, Masahito Yamamoto, Takahisa Murata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoaki SakamotoDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji KobayashiDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruko YamamotoDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sakura MasukoDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahito YamamotoAutonomous Systems Engineering Laboratory, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Takahisa MurataDepartment of Animal Radiology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPHokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grooming is a common behavior for animals to care for their fur, maintain hygiene, and regulate body temperature. Since various factors, including stressors and genetic mutations, affect grooming quantitatively and qualitatively, the assessment of grooming is important to understand the status of experimental animals. However, current grooming detection methods are time-consuming, laborious, and require specialized equipment. In addition, they generally cannot discriminate grooming microstructures such as face washing and body licking. In this study, we aimed to develop an automated grooming detection method that can distinguish facial grooming from body grooming by image analysis using artificial intelligence. Mouse behavior was recorded using a standard hand camera. We carefully observed videos and labeled each time point as facial grooming, body grooming, and not grooming. We constructed a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) and trained it using the labeled images. Since the output of the trained 3D-CNN included unlikely short grooming bouts and interruptions, we set posterior filters to remove them. The performance of the trained 3D-CNN and filters was evaluated using a first-look dataset that was not used for training. The sensitivity of facial and body grooming detection reached 81.3% and 91.9%, respectively. The positive predictive rates of facial and body grooming detection were 83.5% and 88.5%, respectively. The number of grooming bouts predicted by our method was highly correlated with human observations (face:

Indexed as

3D-CNNautomated detectionconvolutional neural networkdeep learningexperimental animalsgroomingmouse behavior

Identifiers

PMID35185488
PMCPMC8847608
OpenAlexW4210309342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.