Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185281›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect behavior2021

Investigating the Foraging, Guarding and Drifting Behaviors of Commercial

Ellen L MacKenzie, Dave Goulson, Ellen L Rotheray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen L MacKenzieSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QG UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-7256
Dave GoulsonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QG UK.
Ellen L RotheraySchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QG UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects have high levels of cooperation and division of labor. In bumble bees this is partly size-based, with larger bees performing tasks outside the nest and smaller bees remaining inside, although bumble bees still display considerable behavioral plasticity. The level of specialization in tasks outside the colony, including foraging, guarding and drifting (entering a foreign colony), is currently unknown for bumble bees. This study aimed to assess division of labor between outside tasks and the degree of specialization in foraging, guarding, and switching colonies in commercially reared bumble bees placed in the field. Nine factory-bought SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10905-021-09790-0.

Indexed as

Behavioral plasticityBumble beeForaging strategyRobbingSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID35185281
PMCPMC8813815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.