Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185275›Full record

ArticleComputers in human behavior2022

Higher education managers' perspectives on quality management and technology acceptance: A tale of elders, mediators, and working bees in times of Covid-19.

Luis González Bravo, Nicolae Nistor, Bernardo Castro Ramírez, Ilse Gutiérrez Soto, Marcela Varas Contreras, Mónica Núñez Vives, Pía Maldonado Robles

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in human behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis González BravoUniversidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, Concepción, Chile.
Nicolae NistorLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leopoldstr. 13, D-80802, München, Germany.
Bernardo Castro RamírezUniversidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, Concepción, Chile.
Ilse Gutiérrez SotoUniversidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, Concepción, Chile.
Marcela Varas ContrerasUniversidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, Concepción, Chile.
Mónica Núñez VivesUniversidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, Concepción, Chile.
Pía Maldonado RoblesUniversidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario s/n, Concepción, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has emphasized the role of educational management information systems (EMIS) for quality management (QM) in higher education, and set new directions for post-pandemic studies. Successful implementation of QM processes depends largely on managers' perceptions about quality and educational technology. However, higher education managers' profiles regarding these quality perceptions and their EMIS acceptance have been insufficiently investigated so far. In response to this research gap, we identified such profiles based on a quantitative survey of

Indexed as

Educational management information systemsHigher educationInformation and media literacyQuality managementQuality management and accreditation perceptions scale

Identifiers

PMID35185275
PMCPMC8843415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.