Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185061›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2022

Advantages of Using Both Voxel- and Surface-based Morphometry in Cortical Morphology Analysis: A Review of Various Applications.

Masami Goto, Osamu Abe, Akifumi Hagiwara, Shohei Fujita, Koji Kamagata, Masaaki Hori, Shigeki Aoki, Takahiro Osada, Seiki Konishi, Yoshitaka Masutani and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Composite grey matter fingerprints for genetic frontotemporal dementia.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masami GotoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
Akifumi HagiwaraDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Shohei FujitaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
Koji KamagataDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Masaaki HoriDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Shigeki AokiDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Takahiro OsadaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Seiki KonishiDepartment of Neurophysiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine.
Yoshitaka MasutaniGraduate School of Information Sciences, Hiroshima City University.
Hajime SakamotoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University.
Yasuaki SakanoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University.
Shinsuke KyogokuDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University.
Hiroyuki DaidaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University.
Juntendo University · JPHiroshima City University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface-based morphometry (SBM) is extremely useful for estimating the indices of cortical morphology, such as volume, thickness, area, and gyrification, whereas voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a typical method of gray matter (GM) volumetry that includes cortex measurement. In cases where SBM is used to estimate cortical morphology, it remains controversial as to whether VBM should be used in addition to estimate GM volume. Therefore, this review has two main goals. First, we summarize the differences between the two methods regarding preprocessing, statistical analysis, and reliability. Second, we review studies that estimate cortical morphological changes using VBM and/or SBM and discuss whether using VBM in conjunction with SBM produces additional values. We found cases in which detection of morphological change in either VBM or SBM was superior, and others that showed equivalent performance between the two methods. Therefore, we concluded that using VBM and SBM together can help researchers and clinicians obtain a better understanding of normal neurobiological processes of the brain. Moreover, the use of both methods may improve the accuracy of the detection of morphological changes when comparing the data of patients and controls.In addition, we introduce two other recent methods as future directions for estimating cortical morphological changes: a multi-modal parcellation method using structural and functional images, and a synthetic segmentation method using multi-contrast images (such as T1- and proton density-weighted images).

Indexed as

Gray MatterMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansReproducibility of Resultsconfounding covariatecortex volumesmoothingsurface-based morphometryvoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID35185061
PMCPMC9199978
OpenAlexW4212886743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.