Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185013›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open gastroenterology2022

Effect of single versus multistrain probiotic in extremely preterm infants: a randomised trial.

Gayatri Athalye-Jape, Meera Esvaran, Sanjay Patole, Karen Simmer, Elizabeth Nathan, Dorota Doherty, Anthony Keil, Shripada Rao, Liwei Chen, Lakshmi Chandrasekaran and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Synbiotics on Hygienic Quality of Feed and Pork.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact ofNutrients · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gayatri Athalye-JapeNeonatology directorate, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women Perth, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia gayatri.jape@health.wa.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-6043
Meera EsvaranFaculty of Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sanjay PatoleNeonatal Clinical Care Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Karen SimmerNeonatal Clinical Care Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Elizabeth NathanBiostatistics, Women and Infants Research Foundation Western Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Dorota DohertyBiostatistics, Women and Infants Research Foundation Western Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Anthony KeilMicrobiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Shripada RaoNeonatal Clinical Care Unit, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Liwei ChenGenomics and Bioinformatics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Lakshmi ChandrasekaranGenomics and Bioinformatics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Chooi KokNeonatal Clinical Care Unit, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Stephan SchusterGenomics and Bioinformatics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Patricia ConwayGenomics and Bioinformatics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
King Edward Memorial Hospital · AUNanyang Technological University · SGWomen and Infants Research Foundation · AUPathwest Laboratory Medicine · AUPrincess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvidence indicates that multistrain probiotics benefit preterm infants more than single-strain (SS) probiotics. We assessed the effects of SS versus triple-strain (TS) probiotic supplementation (PS) in extremely preterm (EP) infants.

designEP infants (gestational age (GA) <28 weeks) were randomly allocated to TS or SS probiotic, assuring blinding. Reference (REF) group was EP infants in the placebo arm of our previous probiotic trial. PS was commenced with feeds and continued until 37 weeks' corrected GA. Primary outcome was time to full feed (TFF: 150 mL/kg/day). Secondary outcomes included short-chain fatty acids and faecal microbiota collected at T1 (first week) and T2 (after 3 weeks of PS) using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.

results173 EP (SS: 86, TS: 87) neonates with similar GA and birth weight (BW) were randomised. Median TFF was comparable (11 (IQR 8-16) vs 10 (IQR 8-16) days, p=0.92). Faecal propionate (SS, p<0.001, and TS, p=0.0009) and butyrate levels (TS, p=0.029) were significantly raised in T2 versus T1 samples. Secondary clinical outcomes were comparable. At T2, alpha diversity was comparable (p>0.05) between groups, whereas beta-diversity analysis revealed significant differences between PS and REF groups (both p=0.001). Actinobacteria were higher (both p<0.01), and Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were lower in PS versus REF. Gammaproteobacteria, Clostridia and Negativicutes were lower in both PS versus REF.

conclusionTFF in EP infants was similar between SS and TS probiotics. Both probiotics were effective in reducing dysbiosis (higher bifidobacteria and lower Gammaproteobacteria). Long-term significance of increased propionate and butyrate needs further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12615000940572.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureProbioticsBacillotaBifidobacteriumButyratesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPropionatesButyratesPropionatesinfant/neonatal nutritionintestinal microbiologyneonatal gutprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35185013
PMCPMC8860036
OpenAlexW4213005931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.