Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185012›Full record

ReviewBMJ health & care informatics2022

Developing, implementing and governing artificial intelligence in medicine: a step-by-step approach to prevent an artificial intelligence winter.

Davy van de Sande, Michel E Van Genderen, Jim M Smit, Joost Huiskens, Jacob J Visser, Robert E R Veen, Edwin van Unen, Oliver Hilgers Ba, Diederik Gommers, Jasper van Bommel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ health & care informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. AI Quality Standards in Health Care: Rapid Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Davy van de SandeDepartment of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-0995
Michel E Van GenderenDepartment of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands m.vangenderen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-3435
Jim M SmitDepartment of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost HuiskensSAS Institute Inc, Health, Huizen, The Netherlands.
Jacob J VisserDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert E R VeenDepartment of Information Technology, theme Research Suite, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin van UnenSAS Institute Inc, Health, Huizen, The Netherlands.
Oliver Hilgers BaActive Medical Devices/Medical Device Software, CE Plus GmbH, Badenweiler, Germany.
Diederik GommersDepartment of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jasper van BommelDepartment of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is increasingly studied, most patients do not benefit because the majority of AI models remain in the testing and prototyping environment. The development and implementation trajectory of clinical AI models are complex and a structured overview is missing. We therefore propose a step-by-step overview to enhance clinicians' understanding and to promote quality of medical AI research.

methodsWe summarised key elements (such as current guidelines, challenges, regulatory documents and good practices) that are needed to develop and safely implement AI in medicine.

conclusionThis overview complements other frameworks in a way that it is accessible to stakeholders without prior AI knowledge and as such provides a step-by-step approach incorporating all the key elements and current guidelines that are essential for implementation, and can thereby help to move AI from bytes to bedside.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomedical ResearchHumansartificial intelligencedata sciencemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35185012
PMCPMC8860016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.