Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35185011›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2022

Use of a community advisory board to build equitable algorithms for participation in clinical trials: a protocol paper for HoPeNET.

Nicole Farmer, Foster Osei Baah, Faustine Williams, Erika Ortiz-Chapparo, Valerie M Mitchell, Latifa Jackson, Billy Collins, Lennox Graham, Gwenyth R Wallen, Tiffany M Powell-Wiley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applying Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Clinical Trials: Potential Impacts and Obstacles.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicole FarmerTranslational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Foster Osei BaahSocial Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Faustine WilliamsIntramural Research Program, NIMHD, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Erika Ortiz-ChapparoSocial Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Valerie M MitchellSocial Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Latifa JacksonDepartment of Pediatrics, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
Billy CollinsSocial Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Lennox GrahamDepartment of Health Sciences and Management, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Howard Unversity, Washington, DC, USA.
Gwenyth R WallenTranslational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tiffany M Powell-WileySocial Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, NHLBI, Bethesda, Maryland, USA tiffany.powell-wiley@nih.gov ajohnson@howard.edu.
Allan JohnsonDepartment of Nurtritional Sciences, College of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA tiffany.powell-wiley@nih.gov ajohnson@howard.edu.

Funding

Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment in Washington D.C.ZIAHL006168 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI POWELL-WILEY, TIFFANY · 2013 to 2025
$8.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParticipation from racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials has been burdened by issues surrounding mistrust and access to healthcare. There is emerging use of machine learning (ML) in clinical trial recruitment and evaluation. However, for individuals from groups who are recipients of societal biases, utilisation of ML can lead to the creation and use of biased algorithms. To minimise bias, the design of equitable ML tools that advance health equity could be guided by community engagement processes. The Howard University Partnership with the National Institutes of Health for Equitable Clinical Trial Participation for Racial/Ethnic Communities Underrepresented in Research (HoPeNET) seeks to create an ML-based infrastructure from community advisory board (CAB) experiences to enhance participation of African-Americans/Blacks in clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This triphased cross-sectional study (24 months, n=56) will create a CAB of community members and research investigators. The three phases of the study include: (1) identification of perceived barriers/facilitators to clinical trial engagement through qualitative/quantitative methods and systems-based model building participation; (2) operation of CAB meetings and (3) development of a predictive ML tool and outcome evaluation. Identified predictors from the participant-derived systems-based map will be used for the ML tool development. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We anticipate minimum risk for participants. Institutional review board approval and informed consent has been obtained and patient confidentiality ensured.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsClinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansartificial intelligenceBMJ health informaticshealth equity

Identifiers

PMID35185011
PMCPMC8860013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.