Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35184350›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2023

Intra-individual variability in task performance after cognitive training is associated with long-term outcomes in children.

Ana Cubillo, Henning Hermes, Eva Berger, Kirsten Winkel, Daniel Schunk, Ernst Fehr, Todd A Hare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A dual-process model for cognitive training.NPJ science of learning · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana CubilloZurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-7341
Henning HermesDICE, Heinrich Heine University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9339-4779
Eva BergerChair of Public and Behavioral Economics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Kirsten WinkelChair of Statistics and Econometrics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel SchunkChair of Public and Behavioral Economics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ernst FehrZurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-7821
Todd A HareZurich Center for Neuroeconomics, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0260-2772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential benefits and mechanistic effects of working memory training (WMT) in children are the subject of much research and debate. We show that after five weeks of school-based, adaptive WMT 6-9 year-old primary school children had greater activity in prefrontal and striatal brain regions, higher task accuracy, and reduced intra-individual variability in response times compared to controls. Using a sequential sampling decision model, we demonstrate that this reduction in intra-individual variability can be explained by changes to the evidence accumulation rates and thresholds. Critically, intra-individual variability is useful in quantifying the immediate impact of cognitive training interventions, being a better predictor of academic skills and well-being 6-12 months after the end of training than task accuracy. Taken together, our results suggest that attention control is the initial mechanism that leads to the long-run benefits from adaptive WMT. Selective and sustained attention abilities may serve as a scaffold for subsequent changes in higher cognitive processes, academic skills, and general well-being. Furthermore, these results highlight that the selection of outcome measures and the timing of the assessments play a crucial role in detecting training efficacy. Thus, evaluating intra-individual variability, during or directly after training could allow for the early tailoring of training interventions in terms of duration or content to maximise their impact.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityTask Performance and AnalysisAttentionChildCognitive TrainingHumansMemory, Short-Termattention controlchildrencognitive trainingfMRIintra-individual variabilityworking memory

Identifiers

PMID35184350
PMCPMC10078259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.