Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35184316›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Technical note: Temperature and concentration dependence of water diffusion in polyvinylpyrrolidone solutions.

Ghoncheh Amouzandeh, Thomas L Chenevert, Scott D Swanson, Brian D Ross, Dariya I Malyarenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ghoncheh AmouzandehDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Thomas L ChenevertDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Scott D SwansonDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Brian D RossDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Dariya I MalyarenkoDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Elimination of Instrumental Bias for Quantitative Diffusion Imaging in Clinical Oncology TrialsR01CA190299 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MALYARENKO, DARIYA I. · 2015 to 2025
$6.4M
Imaging of Hematologic and Oncologic DisordersR35CA197701 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROSS, BRIAN D. · 2016 to 2022
$5.9M
Quantitative DW-MRI for Early Breast Cancer Treatment Response AssessmentU01CA166104 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHENEVERT, THOMAS L, GALBAN, CRAIG J · 2012 to 2019
$4.1M
University of Michigan Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging Research ResourceU24CA237683 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHENEVERT, THOMAS L, LUKER, GARY D · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Multicenter Quantitative MRI Assessment of Breast Cancer Therapy ResponseR01CA248192 · NCI · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI WEI HUANG, James H Holmes · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
Validation and Standardization of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Breast CancerR01CA207290 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2017 to 2022
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190299NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207290NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248192NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197701NCI NIH HHS U01 CA166104NCI NIH HHS U24 CA237683NIH HHS R01 CA190299NIH HHS R35 CA197701NIH HHS U01 CA166104NIH HHS U24 CA237683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this work is to provide temperature and concentration calibration of water diffusivity in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solutions used in phantoms to assess system bias and linearity in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements.

methodADC measurements were performed for 40 kDa (K40) PVP of six concentrations (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% by weight) at three temperatures (19.5°C, 22.5°C, and 26.4°C), with internal phantom temperature monitored by optical thermometer (±0.2°C). To achieve ADC measurement and fit accuracy of better than 0.5%, three orthogonal diffusion gradients were calibrated using known water diffusivity at 0°C and system gradient nonlinearity maps. Noise-floor fit bias was also controlled by limiting the maximum b-value used for ADC calculation of each sample. The ADC temperature dependence was modeled by Arrhenius functions of each PVP concentration. The concentration dependence was modeled by quadratic function for ADC normalized by the theoretical water diffusion values. Calibration coefficients were obtained from linear regression model fits.

resultsMeasured phantom ADC values increased with temperature and decreasing PVP concentration, [PVP]. The derived Arrhenius model parameters for [PVP] between 0% and 50%, are reported and can be used for K40 ADC temperature calibration with absolute ADC error within ±0.016 μm

conclusionThe study provides ground-truth ADC values for K40 PVP solutions commonly used in diffusion phantoms for scanning at ambient room temperature. The described procedures and the reported calibration can be used for quality control and standardization of measured ADC values of PVP at different concentrations and temperatures.

Indexed as

PovidoneWaterDiffusionDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingTemperaturePovidoneWaterADC calibrationdiffusion MRIdiffusion phantomPVP concentrationtemperature dependence

Identifiers

PMID35184316
PMCPMC9090959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.