ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2022
Differences in Breast Cancer Costs by Cancer Stage and Biomarker Subtype in New Zealand.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving equitable access to comprehensive care for people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025-2035 (Goal 9).Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Review
- Biomarker-Specific Survival and Medication Cost for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Economic burden of breast cancer: a case of Southern Iran.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- Economic Burden of Cancer for the First Five Years after Cancer Diagnosis in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Korea.Journal of cancer prevention · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer requires the greatest expenditure among all cancer types, and the costs vary by cancer stage and biomarker status.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the differences in public healthcare costs of breast cancer in New Zealand by stage and subtype.
methodThis study included patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2018 and receiving services in public hospitals. These patients were identified from the National Breast Cancer Register and/or New Zealand Cancer Registry. Linking with the Pharmaceutical Collection, National Minimum Dataset, National Non-Admitted Patient Collection, and Mortality Collection, we estimated the median public healthcare costs of breast cancer by cancer stage and biomarker subtype.
resultsWe identified 22,948 eligible patients. The median costs of breast cancer increased with stage of disease, from $NZ26,930 for stage I disease to $NZ50,388 for stage IV disease. The median costs for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) disease were three times those for HER2-negative (HER2-) disease: $NZ106,428 for HER2+ cancers compared with$NZ28,481 for oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- cancers and $NZ31,722 for triple negative disease. Over 55% of the costs for HER2+ breast cancers were targeted therapy costs. For HER2- cancers, surgery incurred the biggest cost, followed by radiotherapy.
conclusionsTreating patients with early-stage breast cancer is less costly than treating those with metastatic disease. The costs vary considerably between the subtypes. Patients with HER2+ cancer incurred three times the costs of those with HER2- cancers. These results provide baseline costing data for clinicians and policy makers when considering new targeted treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.