Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35184253›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

Discerning Between Macular Hemorrhages Due to Macular Neovascularization or Due to Spontaneous Bruch's Membrane Rupture in High Myopia: A Comparative Analysis Between OCTA and Fluorescein Angiography.

Marco Battista, Riccardo Sacconi, Enrico Borrelli, Anna Crepaldi, Federico Fantaguzzi, Eliana Costanzo, Daniele De Geronimo, Mariacristina Parravano, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Differential diagnosis of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV): insights from multimodal imaging and treatment implications.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Battista *School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo Sacconi *School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Enrico BorrelliSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Anna CrepaldiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Federico FantaguzziSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eliana CostanzoFoundation G.B. Bietti-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Daniele De GeronimoFoundation G.B. Bietti-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Mariacristina ParravanoFoundation G.B. Bietti-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BandelloSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe QuerquesSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. giuseppe.querques@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-9581
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITFondazione G.B. Bietti · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in comparison to fluorescein angiography (FA) in discerning between macular hemorrhages due to myopic macular neovascularization (m-MNV) and idiopathic macular hemorrhage (IMH) in patients with high myopia (HM).

methodsIn this retrospective study, 14 eyes of 14 patients (mean age 60 ± 16 years) affected by macular hemorrhage due to HM were included. All patients underwent OCTA and FA at the time of macular hemorrhage (i.e., baseline) and were followed for a 3-month follow-up.

resultsBy means of FA, 8 out of 14 eyes with macular hemorrhage (57%) were diagnosed as type 2 m-MNV, whereas 6 eyes (43%) were diagnosed as IMH. Interestingly, OCTA displayed the presence of a neovascular network in all cases previously diagnosed as m-MNV using FA, and also excluded the presence of anomalous flow in all IMH eyes. This accounted for the high sensitivity and specificity of OCTA for m-MNV detection in HM cases with macular hemorrhage. After 3-month follow-up, BCVA improved from 0.39 ± 0.15 to 0.21 ± 0.14 logMAR (p = 0.006) in patients with m-MNV treated by a mean of 2.3 ± 0.9 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Conversely, BCVA improved without treatment (from 0.55 ± 0.48 to 0.17 ± 0.08 logMAR, p = 0.112) in patients with IMH.

conclusionsOCTA is able to differentiate with excellent reliability between the presence of m-MNV in patients with HM presenting with a new macular hemorrhage and an IMH. This could be of paramount relevance in the clinical setting for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HM.

Indexed as

High myopiaIdiopathic macular hemorrhagesMyopic macular neovascularizationOptical coherence tomography-angiography

Identifiers

PMID35184253
PMCPMC8927552
OpenAlexW4212800621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.