Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35184213›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2022

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in pediatric neck infections-a comparison with adult patients.

Janne Nurminen, Jaakko Heikkinen, Tatu Happonen, Jarno Velhonoja, Heikki Irjala, Tero Soukka, Lauri Ivaska, Kimmo Mattila, Jussi Hirvonen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of Navigation System in the Management of Deep Neck Space Infection-A Case Report.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janne NurminenDiagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland. janne.nurminen@tyks.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-9051
Jaakko HeikkinenDiagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8007-5090
Tatu HapponenDiagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-4985
Jarno VelhonojaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1988-9770
Heikki IrjalaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3054-4677
Tero SoukkaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1144-6724
Lauri IvaskaDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8935-5032
Kimmo MattilaDiagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9522-9830
Jussi HirvonenDiagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0368-3746
University of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferences in the functioning of the immune system and the anatomical proportions of the neck between children and adults lead to different manifestations of deep neck infections. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may serve as an alternative to computed tomography (CT) as the primary imaging modality.

objectiveTo study characteristic MRI findings and the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in pediatric deep neck infections. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively studied a cohort of pediatric patients who underwent a neck 3-tesla MRI study over a five-year period. Inclusion criteria were: 1) emergency MRI findings indicating an infection, 2) infection as the final clinical diagnosis, 3) diagnostic image quality verified by the radiologist reading the study and 4) age under 18 years. Patient record data, including surgery reports, were compared with the MRI findings.

resultsData of 45 children were included and analysed. Compared to adults, children had a higher incidence of retropharyngeal infection and lymphadenitis, and a lower incidence of peritonsillar/parapharyngeal infection. MRI showed evidence of an abscess in 34 children. Of these 34 patients, 24 underwent surgery, which confirmed an abscess in 21 but no abscess in three patients. In addition, three patients underwent surgery without MRI evidence of abscess, and an abscess was found in one of these cases. The measures of diagnostic accuracy among the children were sensitivity 0.96, specificity 0.77, positive predictive value 0.89, negative predictive value 0.91 and accuracy 0.89. Compared with adults, children had lower C-reactive protein, but a similar proportion of them had an abscess, and abscess size and rate of surgery were similar.

conclusionDespite the differences in the infection foci, emergency MRI in children had equal diagnostic accuracy to that in adults.

Indexed as

AbscessNeckAdolescentAdultChest PainChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbscessAdultsChildrenEmergency medicineInfectionMagnetic resonance imagingNeck

Identifiers

PMID35184213
PMCPMC9107440
OpenAlexW4213236607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.