Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35184142›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2023

Clinical outcomes by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score and blood pressure level in high risk individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Katie Harris, Paul Muntner, Mark Woodward, Min Jun, Megumi Oshima, Jessica Gong, Stephen Harrap, Joel Menard, John Chalmers

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Katie HarrisThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. kharris@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2444-2869
Paul MuntnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Min JunThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Megumi OshimaThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jessica GongThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephen HarrapDepartment of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Joel MenardFaculté de Médecine Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
John ChalmersThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-0580
UNSW Sydney · AUDélégation Paris 5 · FRKanazawa University · JPThe George Institute for Global Health · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines for patients with diabetes recommend using blood pressure (BP) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk to guide antihypertensive treatment. While this approach directs treatment to patients who should receive a large ASCVD risk reduction, its effect on other outcomes is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the contributions of systolic blood pressure level (SBP) and predicted 10-year ASCVD risk using Pooled Cohort risk equations to the prediction of major macrovascular disease, death and major microvascular disease in patients with diabetes. Data came from 7426 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) without macrovascular disease at baseline in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. The risk for major macrovascular events and death increased progressively across ASCVD risk categories. Compared to participants with 10-year predicted ASCVD risk <20% and SBP <130 mmHg, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) associated with SBP ≥150 mmHg and 10-year predicted ASCVD risk <20%, 20-34% and ≥35% were 1.01 (0.58, 1.77), 1.90 (1.28, 2.84) and 2.82 (1.98, 4.01) for major macrovascular disease, respectively, and 0.83 (0.42, 1.62), 1.79 (1.13, 2.82) and 3.29 (2.22, 4.88) for death, respectively. The risk for major microvascular disease increased with BP regardless of ASCVD risk; HRs for SBP ≥150 mmHg and 10-year predicted ASCVD risk <20%, 20-34% and ≥35% vs. ASCVD risk <20% and SBP <130 mmHg were 1.52 (1.08,2.13), 1.47 (1.10, 1.96) and 1.23 (0.94, 1.60), respectively. ASCVD risk in addition to SBP improved the estimation of major macrovascular events and death but not major microvascular events among individuals with T2D.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansRisk FactorsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35184142
OpenAlexW4213084642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.