Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183357›Full record

ArticleNursing outlook

Recruitment and retention of primary care nurse practitioners in underserved areas: A scoping review.

Supakorn Kueakomoldej, Eleanor Turi, Amy McMenamin, Ying Xue, Lusine Poghosyan

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Facilitators and Barriers to Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Practice in the United States: A Systematic Review.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Pooled it
  3. Initiatives to support nursing workforce sustainability: A rapid umbrella review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  4. Nurse Practitioner Opioid Prescribing Authority: A Comparative Policy Analysis of New Zealand, United States, and Australia.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. What drives advanced practice nurses to stay in rural America? Insights from the 2022 National Survey of Registered Nurses.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Supakorn KueakomoldejColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY. Electronic address: sk4739@cumc.columbia.edu.
Eleanor TuriColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
Amy McMenaminColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
Ying XueUniversity of Rochester, School of Nursing, Rochester, NY.
Lusine PoghosyanColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY; Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Systems Science and Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness Research Training for Nurse Scientists (S2CER2)T32NR014205 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lusine Poghosyan, Jingjing Shang · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing nurse practitioner (NP) workforce plays a critical role in primary care delivery in the United States. However, better recruitment and retention of the robust NP workforce in underserved areas are needed; evidence to inform such effort is limited. PURPOSE: This scoping review aimed to examine the findings, scope, and knowledge gaps of available literature on factors associated with NP recruitment and retention in underserved areas.

methodsThis review was guided by Joanna Briggs' Scoping Review Methodology and PRISMA-SCR reporting standards. Literature search for peer-reviewed and gray literature was conducted in six databases.

findingsA total of 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Factors associated with NP recruitment and retention in underserved areas were mapped into five themes, including factors related to: the individual NP, NP education programs/financial aid, organizations employing NPs, the communities NPs work in, and autonomous practice. Majority of the included studies were published before 2010; few used rigorous study designs and analysis methods; and few exclusively studied NPs and unique challenges facing the NP workforce. DISCUSSION: Available studies demonstrate that NP recruitment and retention can be addressed by various stakeholders (e.g., educators, policy makers); however, up-to-date, methodologically rigorous, and NP-focused studies are needed.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaNurse PractitionersHumansPrimary Health CareUnited StatesWorkforceNurse practitionerRecruitmentRetentionScoping reviewUnderserved areaUnderserved populationWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35183357
PMCPMC9232900
OpenAlexW4212868343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.