Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183262›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): measurement invariance across genders and item response theory examination.

Joshua Marmara, Daniel Zarate, Jeremy Vassallo, Rhiannon Patten, Vasileios Stavropoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua MarmaraInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, 8001, Australia. joshua.marmara@live.vu.edu.au.
Daniel ZarateInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, 8001, Australia.
Jeremy VassalloInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, 8001, Australia.
Rhiannon PattenInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, 8001, Australia.
Vasileios StavropoulosInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, 8001, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council, Discovery Early Career Researcher Award DE210101107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a measure of subjective well-being and assesses eudemonic and hedonic aspects of well-being. However, differential scoring of the WEMWBS across gender and its precision of measurement has not been examined. The present study assesses the psychometric properties of the WEMWBS using measurement invariance (MI) between males and females and item response theory (IRT) analyses.

methodA community sample of 386 adults from the United States of America (USA), United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada were assessed online (N = 394, 54.8% men, 43.1% women, M

resultsMI analyses observed invariance across males and females at the configural level and metric level but non-invariance at the scalar level. The graded response model (GRM) conducted to observe item properties indicated that all items demonstrated, although variable, sufficient discrimination capacity.

conclusionsGender comparisons based on WEMWBS scores should be cautiously interpreted for specific items that demonstrate different scalar scales and similar scores indicate different severity. The items showed increased reliability for latent levels of ∓ 2 SD from the mean level of SWB. The WEMWBS may also not perform well for clinically low and high levels of SWB. Including assessments for clinical cases may optimise the use of the WEMWBS.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomGenderItem response theoryMeasurement invariancePositive psychologyPsychometric propertiesSubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID35183262
PMCPMC8857792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.