Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35183242›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by peripheral nerve excitability testing (NET).

Zahra Nochi, Hossein Pia, Petra Bloms-Funke, Irmgard Boesl, Ombretta Caspani, Sonya C Chapman, Francesca Fardo, Bernd Genser, Marcus Goetz, Anna V Kostenko and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Zahra NochiDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hossein PiaDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Petra Bloms-FunkeTranslational Science & Intelligence, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Irmgard BoeslClinical Science Development, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Ombretta CaspaniDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Sonya C ChapmanEli Lilly and Company, Arlington Square, Bracknell, UK.
Francesca FardoDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bernd GenserMannheim Institute of Public Health, Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus GoetzMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna V KostenkoDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Caterina LeoneDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Thomas LiTeva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, West Chester, PA, USA.
André MourauxInstitute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernhard PelzMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Esther Pogatzki-ZahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andreas SchilderDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Erik SchnetterUniversity Computing Centre, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karin SchubartConsulTech GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Alexandre StouffsInstitute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Irene TraceyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Iñaki F TroconizDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Andrea TruiniDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Johannes Van NielMature Products Development, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Jose Miguel VelaWelab Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Katy VincentNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health (NDWRH), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jan VollertPain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vishvarani WanigasekeraWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Matthias WittayerDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Hatice TankisiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nanna B FinnerupDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. finnerup@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-0240
Keith G PhillipsNeuroscience Next Generation Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Innovation Center, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rolf-Detlef TreedeDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEAarhus University · DKGrünenthal Group (Germany) · DEJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITAarhus University Hospital · DKEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBEli Lilly (United States) · USImperial College London · GBTeva Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme No 777500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew new drugs have been developed for chronic pain. Drug development is challenged by uncertainty about whether the drug engages the human target sufficiently to have a meaningful pharmacodynamic effect. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1 is one of four similarly designed studies that aim to link different functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics. This study focusses on biomarkers derived from nerve excitability testing (NET) using threshold tracking of the peripheral nervous system.

methodsThis is a multisite single-dose, subject and assessor-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from NET of large sensory and motor fibers and small sensory fibers using perception threshold tracking will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose with at least 1 week apart. Motor and sensory NET will be assessed on the right wrist in a non-sensitized normal condition while perception threshold tracking will be performed bilaterally on both non-sensitized and sensitized forearm skin. Cutaneous high-frequency electrical stimulation is used to induce hyperalgesia. Blood samples will be taken for pharmacokinetic purposes and pain ratings as well as predictive psychological traits will be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split across the two primary outcomes: strength-duration time constant (SDTC; a measure of passive membrane properties and nodal persistent Na DISCUSSION: Measurements of NET using threshold tracking protocols are sensitive to membrane potential at the site of stimulation. Sets of useful indices of axonal excitability collectively may provide insights into the mechanisms responsible for membrane polarization, ion channel function, and activity of ionic pumps during the process of impulse conduction. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT1 hypothesizes that NET can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs in this compartment of the nociceptive system for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification.

trial registrationThis trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019-000942-36 ).

Indexed as

PainPeripheral NervesBiomarkersDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansLacosamideMulticenter Studies as TopicPregabalinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTapentadolBiomarkersLacosamidePregabalinTapentadolAnalgesicsBiomarkersEctopic impulse generationHealthy subjectsHyperalgesiaNerve excitability testingPainPK/PDRCTThreshold tracking

Identifiers

PMID35183242
PMCPMC8857873
OpenAlexW4213103755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.